Medical Image Perception Society 2009 - Day three

Session 10. Displays and Tools. Chair: Kevin Berbaum, PhD

• Medical Virtual Imaging Chain (MEVIC). C Marchessoux, T Kimpe, E. Vansteenkiste, S Staelens, P Schelkens, H Bosmans, A Smith, & M. Guerchaft

• Objective methodology to compare clinical value of computed tomography artifact reduction algorithms. G Spalla, C Marchessoux, M Vaz, A Ricker, & T Kimpe

• LCD Spatial Noise Suppression: Large-field vs. ROI Image Processing. WJ Dallas, H Roehrig, J Fan, EA Krupinski, & J Johnson

• Three-dimensional Simulation of Lung Nodules for Pediatric CT. X Li, E Samei, DM DeLong, RP Jones, AM Gaca, CL Hollingsworth, CM Maxfield, CWT Carrico, & DP Frush

Session 11. Displays and Tools. Chair: Miguel Eckstein, PhD

• Abnormality Manipulation Tools for PET CT. MT Madsen, KS Berbaum, KM Schartz, & RT Caldwell.

• Stereoscopic Digital mammography: Improved Accuracy of Lesion Detection in Breast Cancer Screening. DJ Getty, CJ D’Orsi, & RM Pickett

• Conversion of WorkstationJ to ImageJ Plugin. KM Schartz, KS Berbaum, RT Caldwell, and MT Madsen

• Detectability in tomosynthesis projections, slices and volumes: Comparison of human observer performance in a SKE detection task. I Reiser, K Little, & RM Nishikawa

Thanks Craig, Miguel and Elisabeth for a wonderful event, learned so much in just three days. Plenty of inspiration for future research.

Medical Image Perception Society 2009 - Day two

Session 6. Performance Measurement II. Chair: Matthew Freedman, MD, MBA

• Coding of FDG Intensity as a 3-D Rendered Height Mapping to Improve Fusion Display of Co-Registered PET-CT Images. RM Shah, C Wood, YP Hu, & LS Zuckier

• Revisiting the General Three-class ROC Theory. X He & EC Frey

• Estimation of AUC from Normally Distributed Rating Data with Known Variance Ratio. A Wunderlich & F Noo

• Using the Mean-to-Variance Ratio as a Diagnostic for Unacceptably Improper Binormal ROC Curves. SL Hillis & KS Berbaum

Session 7. Performance Measurement II. Chair: Stephen Hillis, PhD

• BI-RADS Data Should Not be Used to Estimate ROC Curves. Y Jiang & CE Metz
  
  
• Estimating the utility of screening mammography in large clinical studies. CK Abbey, JM Boone, & MP Eckstein
  
  
• Issues Related to the Definition of Image Contrast, DL Leong & PC Brennan

Session 8. Models of Perceptual processing. Chair: Yulei Jiang, PhD

• Channelized Hotelling Observers for Detection Tasks in Multi-Slice Images. L Platiša, B Goossens, E Vansteenkiste, A Badano & W Philips
  
  
• Channelized Hotelling observers adapted to irregular signals in breast tomosynthesis detection tasks. I Diaz, P Timberg, CK Abbey, MP Eckstein, FR Verdun, C Castella, FO Bochud
  
  
• Detecting Compression Artifacts in Virtual Pathology Images Using a Visual Discrimination Model. J Johnson & EA Krupinski
  
  
• Automatic MRI Acquisition Parameters Optimization Using HVS-Based Maps. J Jacobsen, P Irarrázabal, & C Tejos
  
  
• Parametric Assessment of Lesion Detection Using a Pre-whitened Matched Filter on Projected Breast CT Images. N Packard, CK Abbey, & JM Boone
  
  
• Model Observers for Complex Discrimination Tasks: Deployment Assessment of Multiple Coronary Stents. S Zhang, CK Abbey, X Da, JS Whiting, & MP Eckstein

Session 9. Special Invited Session on Neuroscience and Medical Image Perception. Chair: Miguel Eckstein, PhD

• Natural image statistics and visual coding. BA Olshausen

• Decoding Information Processing When Attention Fails: An Electrophysiological Approach. B Giesbrecht

• Some Neural Bases of Radiological Expertise. SA Engel

Medical Image Perception Society 2009 - Day one

The first day of the Medical Image Perception Society conference, held biannual, this year in Santa Barbara was filled with interesting talks. Plenty of research utilizing eye tracking as a means of obtaining data. The conference is hosted by Craig Abbey and Miguel Eckstein at the Department of Psychology at the University of California, Santa Barbara in cooperation with Elizabeth Krupinski (book1 , book2) from University of Arizona whom has performed extensive research on eye movements (among other things) in relation to medical imaging and radiology.

Session 1. Visual Search. Chair: Claudia Mello-Thoms, PhD

• Seeing trouble in a flash: Discrimination of normal from abnormal mammograms with brief exposure. KK Evans (current), D Georgian-Smith, R Birdwell, & JM Wolfe

• Mapping Eye Movements in Three-Dimensions: Analyzing Gaze Paths when Interpreting Volumetric Chest CT Data. M Tall, DL Ly, F Schmitzberger, D Rasooly, TJ Kim, JE Roos, DS Paik, S Napel, & GD Rubin

• Measuring Axial CTC Interaction. P Phillips

• Using eye-tracking to study diagnostic process during MRI scanning. C Cavaro-Ménard, J-Y Tanguy, & P Le Callet

Session 2. Visual Search. Chair: Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD

• Visual Search Characteristics of Pathology Residents Reading Dermatopathology Slides. J Law & C Mello-Thoms

• Are you a good eye-witness? Perceptual differences between physicians and lay people. C Mello-Thoms

• Eye movements and computer-based mammographic interpretation training. Y Chen & A Gale

Session 3. Perceptual Effects. Chair: David Manning, PhD

• Nuisance levels of noise effects Radiologists Performance. MF Mc Entee, A O'Beirne, J Ryan, R Toomey, M Evanoff, D Chakraborty, D Manning, & PC. Brennan

• Observer Performance in Stroke Interpretation: The Influence of Experience and Clinical Information in Multidimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. L Cooper, A Gale, J Saada, S Gedela, H Scott, & A Toms

• Interpretation of wrist radiographs: A comparison between final year medical and radiography students. L Hutchinson, P Brennan & L Rainford

• Tumor measurement for revised TNM staging of lung cancer. FL Jacobson, A Sitek, D Getty, & SE Seltzer

• Does Reader Visual Fatigue Impact Performance? EA Krupinski & KS Berbaum

• Ambient Temperature is an Important Consideration in the Radiology Reading Room. MF Mc Entee & S Gafoor

Session 4. Performance Measurement I. Chair: Dev Chakraborty, PhD

• Perceptual indicators of the holistic view in pulmonary nodule detection. MW Pietrzyk, DJ Manning, T Donovan, & Alan Dix

• An e-learning tutorial demonstrates significant improvements in ROC performance amongst naive observers in breast image interpretation. PBL Soh, PC Brennan, A Poulos, W Reed

• Is n ROC-type response Truly always better than A Binary Response? D Gur, AI Bandos, HE Rockette, ML Zuley, CM Hakim, DM Chough, MA Ganott

• Recognition of Images in Reader Studies: How Well Can We Predict Which Will Be Remembered? T Miner Haygood, P O’Sullivan, J Ryan, E Galvan, J-M Yamal, M Evanoff, M McEntee, J Madewell, C Sandler, E Lano, & P Brennan

Session 5. Performance Measurement I. Chair: Alastair Gale, PhD

• New classes of models with monotonic likelihood ratios. F Samuelson

• Sample size estimation procedure for free-response (FROC) studies. DP Chakraborty & M Bath

• Comparison of Four Methods (ROC, JAFROC, IDCA, and ROI) for Analysis of Free Response Clinical Data. F Zanca, DP Chakraborty, J Jacobs, G. Marchal, and H Bosmans

Feel free to post additional links in the comments. Slides will be posted as they become available.