ETRA 2k10 Program Announced!

The awaited program for this years Eye Tracking Research and Applications symposium held in Austin, Texas, 22nd-24th March has been announced. The biennial get-together for leading research on eye movement research targeting computer scientists, engineers and behavioral researchers, is organized in conjunction with the European Communication By Gaze Interaction (COGAIN) association. Which emphasizes a certain focus on gaze-based interaction for individuals with physical motor control disabilities. This years keynote will be given by Scott MacKenzie, Associate Professor of Computer Science and Engineering at York University, Canada.

The long papers section contains 18 entries reflecting the various areas of eye gaze research, from eye tracking, data analysis, visualization, cognitive studies, and interaction & control. In addition, the long list of short papers and a full poster section will ensure a worthwhile event for anyone interested in eye movement related research.

Update: Official detailed program now available.
Update: The papers are now available online.

Looking forward to meeting you there!

Eye tracking & technical achievements

Full papers:

• Homography Normalization for Robust Gaze Estimation in Uncalibrated Setups
  Dan Witzner Hansen, Javier San Agustin, and Arantxa Villanueva. Full paper.
  
  
• Head-Mounted Eye-Tracking of Infants’ Natural Interactions: A New Method
  John Franchak, Kari Kretch, Kasey Soska, Jason Babcock, and Karen Adolph. Full paper.
  
  
• User-Calibration-Free Remote Gaze Estimation System
  Dmitri Model and Moshe Eizenman. Full paper.
  

Short papers:

• The Pupillometric Precision of a Remote Video Eye Tracker
  Jeff Klingner. Short paper.
  
  
• Biometric Identification via an Oculomotor Plant Mathematical Model
  Oleg Komogortsev, Sampath Jayarathna, Cecilia Aragon, and Mechehoul Mahmoud. Short paper.
  
  
• SemantiCode: Using Content Similarity and Database-driven Matching to Code Wearable Eyetracker Gaze Data
  Daniel Pontillo, Thomas Kinsman, and Jeff Pelz. Short paper.
  
  
• Gaze Estimation Method based on an Aspherical Model of the Cornea: Surface of Revolution about the Optical Axis of the Eye
  Takashi Nagamatsu, Yukina Iwamoto, Junzo Kamahara, Naoki Tanaka, and Michiya Yamamoto. Short paper.
  
  
• User-calibration-free Gaze Tracking with Estimation of the Horizontal Angles between the Visual and the Optical Axes of Both Eyes
  Takashi Nagamatsu, Ryuichi Sugano, Yukina Iwamoto, Junzo Kamahara, and Naoki Tanaka. Short paper.
  
  Posters:
  
  
• Evaluation of a Low-Cost Open-Source Gaze Tracker
  John Hansen, Dan Witzner Hansen, Emilie Møllenbach, Martin Tall, Javier San Agustin, Maria Barrett, and Henrik Skovsgaard. Poster.
  
  
• Measuring Vergence Over Stereoscopic Video with a Remote Eye Tracker
  Brian Daugherty, Andrew Duchowski, Donald House, and Celambarasan Ramasamy. Poster.
  
  
• Learning Relevant Eye Movement Feature Spaces Across Users.
  Zakria Hussain, Kitsuchart Pasupa, and John Shawe-Taylor. Poster.
  
  
• Interactive Interface for Remote Administration of Clinical Tests Based on Eye Tracking
  Alberto Faro, Daniela Giordano, Concetto Spampinato, Davide De Tommaso, and Simona Ullo. Poster.
  
  
• Robust Optical Eye Detection During Head Movement
  Jeffrey Mulligan and Kevin Gabayan. Poster.
  
  
• Estimating 3D Point-of-regard and Visualizing Gaze Trajectories under Natural Head Movements
  Kentaro Takemura, Yuji Kohashi, Tsuyoshi Suenaga, Jun Takamatsu, and Tsukasa Ogasawara. Poster.
  
  
• Eye Tracking with the Adaptive Optics Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope
  Scott Stevenson, Austin Roorda, and Girish Kumar. Poster.
  
  
• A Depth Compensation Method for Cross-Ratio Based Eye Tracking
  Flavio L. Coutinho and Carlos H. Morimoto. Poster.
  
  
• Pupil Center Detection in Low Resolution Images
  Detlev Droege and Dietrich Paulus. Poster.
  
  
• Development of Eye-Tracking Pen Display Based on Stereo Bright Pupil Technique
  Michiya Yamamoto, Takashi Nagamatsu, and Tomio Watanabe. Poster.
  
  
• The Use of Eye Tracking for PC Energy Management
  Vasily Moshnyaga
  
  
• Listing's and Donders' Laws and the Estimation of the Point-of-Gaze
  Elias Guestrin and Moshe Eizenman
  
  

Data processing & eye movement detection

Full papers:

• A Vector-Based, Multi-Dimensional Scanpath Similiarty Measure
  Halszka Jarodzka, Kenneth Holmqvist, and Marcus Nyström. Full paper.
  
  
• Match-Moving for Area-Based Analysis of Eye Movements in Natural Tasks
  Andrew Duchowski, Wayne Ryan, Ellen Vincent, and Dina Battisto. Full paper.
  
  
• Fixation-Aligned Pupillary Response Averaging
  Jeff Klingner. Full paper.
  
  
  Posters:
  
  
• Qualitative and Quantitative Scoring and Evaluation of the Eye Movement Classification Algorithms.
  Oleg Komogortsev, Sampath Jayarathna, Do Hyong Koh, and Sandeep Munikrishne Gowda. Poster.
  
  
• Group-Wise Similarity and Classification of Aggregate Scanpaths
  Thomas Grindinger, Andrew Duchowski, and Michael Sawyer. Poster.
  
  

Visualization

Full papers:

• Visual Scanpath Representation
  Joseph Goldberg and Jonathan Helfman. Full paper.
  
  
• Scanpath Comparison Revisited
  Andrew Duchowski, Jason Driver, Sheriff Jolaoso, Beverly Ramey, Ami Robbins, and William Tan. Full paper.
  
  
• Scanpath Clustering and Aggregation
  Joseph Goldberg and Jonathan Helfman. Full paper.
  
  
• Space-Variant Spatio-Temporal Filtering of Video for Gaze Visualization and Perceptual Learning
  Michael Dorr, Halszka Jarodzka, and Erhardt Barth. Full paper.
  
  Posters:
  
  
• Adapted Gaze Visualizations for Three-dimensional Virtual Environments
  Sophie Stellmach, Lennart Nacke, and Raimund Dachselt. Poster.
  
  
• Visual Span and Other Parameters for the Generation of Heatmaps
  Pieter Blignaut. Poster.
  

Cognitive studies & HCI

Full papers:

• Interpretation of Geometric Shapes - An Eye Movement Study
  Miquel Prats, Iestyn Jowers, Nieves Pedreira, Steve Garner, and Alison McKay. Full paper.
  
  
• Understanding the Benefits of Gaze Enhanced Visual Search
  Pernilla Qvarfordt, Jacob Biehl, Gene Golovchinksy, and Tony Dunnigan. Full paper.
  
  
• Image Ranking with Implicit Feedback from Eye Movements
  David Hardoon and Kitsuchart Pasupa. Full paper.
  
  
• How the Interface Design Influences Users’ Spontaneous Trustworthiness Evaluations of Web Search Results: Comparing a List and a Grid Interface
  Yvonne Kammerer and Peter Gerjets. Full paper.
  
  Short papers:
  
  
• Have You Seen Any of These Men? Looking at Whether Eyewitnesses Use Scanpaths to Recognize Suspects in Photo Lineups
  Sheree Josephson and Michael Holmes. Short paper.
  
  
• Contingency Evaluation of Gaze-Contingent Displays for Real-Time Visual Field Simulations
  Margarita Vinnikov and Robert Allison. Short paper.
  
  
• Estimation of Viewer's Response for Contextual Understanding of Tasks of Using Features of Eye-movements
  Minoru Nakayama and Yuko Hayashi. Short paper.
  

Posters:

• Gaze-based Web Search: The Impact of Interface Design on Search Result Selection
  Yvonne Kammerer and Wolfgang Beinhauer. Poster
  
  
• Visual Search in the (Un)Real World: How Head-Mounted Displays Affect Eye Movements, Head Movements and Target Detection
  Tobit Kollenberg, Alexander Neumann, Dorothe Schneider, Tessa-Karina Tews, Thomas Hermann, Helge Ritter, Angelika Dierker, and Hendrik Koesling. Poster.
  
  
• Quantification of Aesthetic Viewing Using Eye-Tracking Technology: The Influence of Previous Training in Apparel Design
  Juyeon Park, Marilyn DeLong, and Emily Woods. Poster.
  
  
• Visual Attention for Implicit Relevance Feedback in a Content Based Image Retrieval
  Concetto Spampinato, Alberto Faro, Daniela Giordano, and Carmelo Pino. Poster.
  
  
• Eye and Pointer Coordination in Search and Selection Tasks
  Hans-Joachim Bieg, Lewis Chuang, Roland Fleming, Harald Reiterer, and Heinrich Bülthoff. Poster.
  
  
• Natural Scene Statistics at Stereo Fixations
  Yang Liu, Lawrence Cormack, and Alan Bovik. Poster.
  
  
• Measuring Situation Awareness of Surgeons in Laparoscopic Training
  Geoffrey Tien, Bin Zheng, Stella Atkins, and Colin Swindells
  
  
• Saliency-Based Decision Support
  Roxanne Canosa. Poster.
  
  
• Inferring Object Relevance from Gaze in Dynamic Scenes
  Melih Kandemir, Veli-Matti Saarinen, and Samuel Kaski. Poster.
  
  
• Using Eye Tracking to Investigate Important Cues for Representative Creature Motion
  Meredith McLendon, Ann McNamara, Tim McLaughlin, and Ravindra Dwivedi
  
  
• Estimating Cognitive Load Using Remote Eye Tracking in a Driving Simulator
  Oskar Palinko, Andrew Kun, Alexander Shyrokov, and Peter Heeman

Computer and machine control

Full papers:

• Alternatives to Single Character Entry and Dwell Time Selection on Eye Typing
  Mario Urbina and Anke Huckauf. Full paper.
  
  
• Designing Gaze Gestures for Gaming: an Investigation of Performance
  Howell Istance, Aulikki Hyrskykari, Lauri Immonen, Santtu Mansikkamaa, and Stephen Vickers. Full paper.
  
  
• ceCursor, a Contextual Eye Cursor for General Pointing in Windows Environments
  Marco Porta, Alice Ravarelli, and Giovanni Spagnoli. Full paper.
  
  
• BlinkWrite2: An Improved Text Entry Method Using Eye Blinks
  Behrooz Ashtiani and Scott MacKenzie. Full paper.
  
  Short papers:
  
  
• Eye Movement as an Interaction Mechanism for Relevance Feedback in a Content-Based Image Retrieval System
  Yun Zhang, Hong FU, Zhen Liang, Zheru Chi, and Dagand Feng. Short paper.
  
  
• Gaze Scribing in Physics Problem Solving
  David Rosengrant. Short paper.
  
  
• Content-based Image Retrieval Using a Combination of Visual Features and Eye Tracking Data
  Zhen Liang, Hong FU, Yun Zhang, Zheru Chi, and Dagan Feng. Short paper.
  
  
• Context Switching for Fast Key Selection in Text Entry Applications
  Carlos H. Morimoto and Arnon Amir. Short paper.
  
  Posters
  
  
• Small-Target Selection with Gaze Alone
  Henrik Skovsgaard, Julio Mateo, John Flach, and John Paulin Hansen. Poster
  

• What You See is Where You Go: Testing a Gaze-Driven Power Wheelchair for Individuals with Severe Multiple Disabilities
  Erik Wästlund, Kay Sponseller, and Ola Pettersson. Poster.
  
  
• Single Gaze Gestures
  Emilie Møllenbach, Alastair Gale, Martin Lillholm, and John Paulin Hansen. Poster.
  
  
• Using Vision and Voice to Create a Multimodal Interface for Microsoft Word 2007
  Tanya Beelders and Pieter Blignaut. Poster.
  
  
• Towards Task-Independent Person Authentication Using Eye Movement Signals
  Tomi Kinnunen, Filip Sedlak, and Roman Bednarik
  
  
• An Open Source Eye-gaze Interface: Expanding the Adoption of Eye-Gaze in Everyday Applications
  Craig Hennessey and Andrew Duchowski. Poster.
  
  
• Pies with EYEs: The Limits of Hierarchical Pie Menus in Gaze Control
  Mario Urbina, Maike Lorenz, and Anke Huckauf. Poster.

• Low-Latency Combined Eye and Head Tracking System for Teleoperating a Robotic Head in Real-Time
  Stefan Kohlbecher, Klaus Bartl, Stanislavs Bardins, and Erich Schneider. Poster.
  

Mobile Dias Eye Tracker

Remember the Dias Eyetracker that I wrote about last May? Today Diako Mardanbeigi, from Tehran in Iran, presents a new version of the Dias eye tracker that is low-cost, wireless and fully mobile. I'll let the video demonstration below speak for itself. Rumor has it that Dias has been in contact with the ITU GazeGroup for a potential continuation of his research. Time will tell.



"This is a low cost mobile eye tracker with a wireless and Light weight head mounted hardware. This system gathers eye movements and estimates the point of gaze during the performance of daily tasks. It can let you to assess the visual behavior of the person online and in real-time when he is doing a specific task. A mobile eye tracker has a wide variety of applications in several fields such as human factors, market research, consumer shopping behavior, sports, driving, reading, safety & training. "

PhD Defense: Off-the-Shelf Gaze Interaction

Javier San Agustin will defend his PhD thesis on "Off-the-Shelf Gaze Interaction" at the IT University of Copenhagen on the 8th of January from 13.00 to (at most) 17.00. The program for the event consists of a one hour presentation which is followed by a discussion with the committee, formed by Andrew Duchowski, Bjarne Kjær Ersbøll, and Arne John Glenstrup. Whereby a traditional reception with snacks and drinks will be held.

Update: The thesis is now available as PDF, 179 pages, 3.6MB.

Abstract of the thesis:

People with severe motor-skill disabilities are often unable to use standard input devices such as a mouse or a keyboard to control a computer and they are, therefore, in strong need for alternative input devices. Gaze tracking offers them the possibility to use the movements of their eyes to interact with a computer, thereby making them more independent. A big effort has been put toward improving the robustness and accuracy of the technology, and many commercial systems are nowadays available in the market.

Despite the great improvements that gaze tracking systems have undergone in the last years, high prices have prevented gaze interaction from becoming mainstream. The use of specialized hardware, such as industrial cameras or infrared light sources, increases the accuracy of the systems, but also the price, which prevents many potential users from having access to the technology. Furthermore, the different components are often required to be placed in specific locations, or are built into the monitor, thus decreasing the flexibility of the setup.

Gaze tracking systems built from low-cost and off-the-shelf components have the potential to facilitate access to the technology and bring the prices down. Such systems are often more flexible, as the components can be placed in different locations, but also less robust, due to the lack of control over the hardware setup and the lower quality of the components compared to commercial systems.

The work developed for this thesis deals with some of the challenges introduced by the use of low-cost and off-the-shelf components for gaze interaction. The main contributions are:

• Development and performance evaluation of the ITU Gaze Tracker, an off-the-shelf gaze tracker that uses an inexpensive webcam or video camera to track the user's eye. The software is readily available as open source, offering the possibility to try out gaze interaction for a low price and to analyze, improve and extend the software by modifying the source code.

• A novel gaze estimation method based on homographic mappings between planes. No knowledge about the hardware configuration is required, allowing for a flexible setup where camera and light sources can be placed at any location.

• A novel algorithm to detect the type of movement that the eye is performing, i.e. fixation, saccade or smooth pursuit. The algorithm is based on eye velocity and movement pattern, and allows to smooth the signal appropriately for each kind of movement to remove jitter due to noise while maximizing responsiveness.

Scandinavian Workshop on Applied Eye-tracking (SWAET) 2010.

The first call for papers for the annual Scandinavian Workshop on Applied Eye-Tracking (SWAET) organized by Kenneth Holmqvist and the team at the Lund University Humanities laboratory was just announced. The SWAET 2010 will be held in Lund, Sweden between May 5-7th. The invited speaker is Gerry Altmann (blog) from the Dept. of Psychology at University of York, UK and Ignace Hooge (s1, s2) from the Dept. of Psychology at Utrecht University, Holland.

Visit the SWAET website for more information.

Update: Download the abstracts (pdf, 1Mb)

Remote tracker and 6DOF using a webcam

The following video clips demonstrates a Masters thesis project from the AGH University of Science and Technology in Cracow, Poland. The method developed provides 6 degrees of freedom head tracking and 2D eye tracking using a simple, low resolution 640x480 webcam. Under the hood it's based on the Lucas-Kanade optical flow and POSIT. A great start as the head tracking seems relatively stable. Imagine it with IR illumination, a camera with slightly higher resolution and a narrow angle lens. And of course, pupil + glint tracking algorithms for calibrated gaze estimation.

ITU GazeTracker in the wild

Came across these two Youtube videos from students out there using the ITU GazeTracker in their HCI projects. By now the software has been downloaded 3000 times and the forum has seen close to three hundred posts. It's been a good start, better yet, a new version is in the makings. It offers a complete network API for third party applications, improved tracking performance, better camera control and a number of bugfixes (thanks for your feedback). It will be released when it's ready.







Thanks for posting the videos!

Nokia near-eye display gaze interaction update

The Nokia near-eye gaze interaction platform that I tried in Finland last year has been further improved. The cap used to support the weight has been replaced with a sturdy frame and the overall prototype seems lighter and also incorporates headphones. The new gaze based navigation interface support photo browsing based on the Image Space application, allowing location based accesses to user generated content. See the concept video at the bottom for their futuristic concept. Nokia research website. The prototype will be displayed at the International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality conference in Orlando, October 19-22.

Medical Image Perception Society 2009 - Day three

Session 10. Displays and Tools. Chair: Kevin Berbaum, PhD

• Medical Virtual Imaging Chain (MEVIC). C Marchessoux, T Kimpe, E. Vansteenkiste, S Staelens, P Schelkens, H Bosmans, A Smith, & M. Guerchaft

• Objective methodology to compare clinical value of computed tomography artifact reduction algorithms. G Spalla, C Marchessoux, M Vaz, A Ricker, & T Kimpe

• LCD Spatial Noise Suppression: Large-field vs. ROI Image Processing. WJ Dallas, H Roehrig, J Fan, EA Krupinski, & J Johnson

• Three-dimensional Simulation of Lung Nodules for Pediatric CT. X Li, E Samei, DM DeLong, RP Jones, AM Gaca, CL Hollingsworth, CM Maxfield, CWT Carrico, & DP Frush

Session 11. Displays and Tools. Chair: Miguel Eckstein, PhD

• Abnormality Manipulation Tools for PET CT. MT Madsen, KS Berbaum, KM Schartz, & RT Caldwell.

• Stereoscopic Digital mammography: Improved Accuracy of Lesion Detection in Breast Cancer Screening. DJ Getty, CJ D’Orsi, & RM Pickett

• Conversion of WorkstationJ to ImageJ Plugin. KM Schartz, KS Berbaum, RT Caldwell, and MT Madsen

• Detectability in tomosynthesis projections, slices and volumes: Comparison of human observer performance in a SKE detection task. I Reiser, K Little, & RM Nishikawa

Thanks Craig, Miguel and Elisabeth for a wonderful event, learned so much in just three days. Plenty of inspiration for future research.

Medical Image Perception Society 2009 - Day two

Session 6. Performance Measurement II. Chair: Matthew Freedman, MD, MBA

• Coding of FDG Intensity as a 3-D Rendered Height Mapping to Improve Fusion Display of Co-Registered PET-CT Images. RM Shah, C Wood, YP Hu, & LS Zuckier

• Revisiting the General Three-class ROC Theory. X He & EC Frey

• Estimation of AUC from Normally Distributed Rating Data with Known Variance Ratio. A Wunderlich & F Noo

• Using the Mean-to-Variance Ratio as a Diagnostic for Unacceptably Improper Binormal ROC Curves. SL Hillis & KS Berbaum

Session 7. Performance Measurement II. Chair: Stephen Hillis, PhD

• BI-RADS Data Should Not be Used to Estimate ROC Curves. Y Jiang & CE Metz
  
  
• Estimating the utility of screening mammography in large clinical studies. CK Abbey, JM Boone, & MP Eckstein
  
  
• Issues Related to the Definition of Image Contrast, DL Leong & PC Brennan

Session 8. Models of Perceptual processing. Chair: Yulei Jiang, PhD

• Channelized Hotelling Observers for Detection Tasks in Multi-Slice Images. L Platiša, B Goossens, E Vansteenkiste, A Badano & W Philips
  
  
• Channelized Hotelling observers adapted to irregular signals in breast tomosynthesis detection tasks. I Diaz, P Timberg, CK Abbey, MP Eckstein, FR Verdun, C Castella, FO Bochud
  
  
• Detecting Compression Artifacts in Virtual Pathology Images Using a Visual Discrimination Model. J Johnson & EA Krupinski
  
  
• Automatic MRI Acquisition Parameters Optimization Using HVS-Based Maps. J Jacobsen, P Irarrázabal, & C Tejos
  
  
• Parametric Assessment of Lesion Detection Using a Pre-whitened Matched Filter on Projected Breast CT Images. N Packard, CK Abbey, & JM Boone
  
  
• Model Observers for Complex Discrimination Tasks: Deployment Assessment of Multiple Coronary Stents. S Zhang, CK Abbey, X Da, JS Whiting, & MP Eckstein

Session 9. Special Invited Session on Neuroscience and Medical Image Perception. Chair: Miguel Eckstein, PhD

• Natural image statistics and visual coding. BA Olshausen

• Decoding Information Processing When Attention Fails: An Electrophysiological Approach. B Giesbrecht

• Some Neural Bases of Radiological Expertise. SA Engel

Medical Image Perception Society 2009 - Day one

The first day of the Medical Image Perception Society conference, held biannual, this year in Santa Barbara was filled with interesting talks. Plenty of research utilizing eye tracking as a means of obtaining data. The conference is hosted by Craig Abbey and Miguel Eckstein at the Department of Psychology at the University of California, Santa Barbara in cooperation with Elizabeth Krupinski (book1 , book2) from University of Arizona whom has performed extensive research on eye movements (among other things) in relation to medical imaging and radiology.

Session 1. Visual Search. Chair: Claudia Mello-Thoms, PhD

• Seeing trouble in a flash: Discrimination of normal from abnormal mammograms with brief exposure. KK Evans (current), D Georgian-Smith, R Birdwell, & JM Wolfe

• Mapping Eye Movements in Three-Dimensions: Analyzing Gaze Paths when Interpreting Volumetric Chest CT Data. M Tall, DL Ly, F Schmitzberger, D Rasooly, TJ Kim, JE Roos, DS Paik, S Napel, & GD Rubin

• Measuring Axial CTC Interaction. P Phillips

• Using eye-tracking to study diagnostic process during MRI scanning. C Cavaro-Ménard, J-Y Tanguy, & P Le Callet

Session 2. Visual Search. Chair: Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD

• Visual Search Characteristics of Pathology Residents Reading Dermatopathology Slides. J Law & C Mello-Thoms

• Are you a good eye-witness? Perceptual differences between physicians and lay people. C Mello-Thoms

• Eye movements and computer-based mammographic interpretation training. Y Chen & A Gale

Session 3. Perceptual Effects. Chair: David Manning, PhD

• Nuisance levels of noise effects Radiologists Performance. MF Mc Entee, A O'Beirne, J Ryan, R Toomey, M Evanoff, D Chakraborty, D Manning, & PC. Brennan

• Observer Performance in Stroke Interpretation: The Influence of Experience and Clinical Information in Multidimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. L Cooper, A Gale, J Saada, S Gedela, H Scott, & A Toms

• Interpretation of wrist radiographs: A comparison between final year medical and radiography students. L Hutchinson, P Brennan & L Rainford

• Tumor measurement for revised TNM staging of lung cancer. FL Jacobson, A Sitek, D Getty, & SE Seltzer

• Does Reader Visual Fatigue Impact Performance? EA Krupinski & KS Berbaum

• Ambient Temperature is an Important Consideration in the Radiology Reading Room. MF Mc Entee & S Gafoor

Session 4. Performance Measurement I. Chair: Dev Chakraborty, PhD

• Perceptual indicators of the holistic view in pulmonary nodule detection. MW Pietrzyk, DJ Manning, T Donovan, & Alan Dix

• An e-learning tutorial demonstrates significant improvements in ROC performance amongst naive observers in breast image interpretation. PBL Soh, PC Brennan, A Poulos, W Reed

• Is n ROC-type response Truly always better than A Binary Response? D Gur, AI Bandos, HE Rockette, ML Zuley, CM Hakim, DM Chough, MA Ganott

• Recognition of Images in Reader Studies: How Well Can We Predict Which Will Be Remembered? T Miner Haygood, P O’Sullivan, J Ryan, E Galvan, J-M Yamal, M Evanoff, M McEntee, J Madewell, C Sandler, E Lano, & P Brennan

Session 5. Performance Measurement I. Chair: Alastair Gale, PhD

• New classes of models with monotonic likelihood ratios. F Samuelson

• Sample size estimation procedure for free-response (FROC) studies. DP Chakraborty & M Bath

• Comparison of Four Methods (ROC, JAFROC, IDCA, and ROI) for Analysis of Free Response Clinical Data. F Zanca, DP Chakraborty, J Jacobs, G. Marchal, and H Bosmans

Feel free to post additional links in the comments. Slides will be posted as they become available.